Dyno results are in...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 4, 2007 | 11:44 PM
  #1  
Baby NSX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 293
From: Toronto
Default Dyno results are in...

So now I am officially a member of the 200+ WHP club, but I just squeaked in there. Finally took my car to a dyno and got the WOT stuff sorted out. Some may be disappointed with my results but I am not. My spoon header, stock intake manifold and throttle body are the likely reasons I’m not sitting at 210+ right now. Knowing these limitations I’m pretty pleased to see numbers around 200. My old engine with the same external bolt-ons made 178.

A big thanks to Nick at -------- who ran the car on the dyno and helped me out with the final adjustments.

An SMSP header is definitely on my short shopping list as well as a couple more goodies; however, I’ll have to wait until all the Expo bills are paid before I dig into the wallet again.

Here is the graph:


And a few pics (not taken by me) from my shake down lapping event I did a couple weeks ago… the car is quick!








Thanks to everyone who helped me through this. Special nods go out to Skunk2, King Motorsports, PIC and of course my builder Gord Bush Performance.
Old Jun 5, 2007 | 01:30 AM
  #2  
HKJ's Avatar
HKJ
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,043
From: richmond hill
Default

good job. whats up with your driver side door?
Old Jun 5, 2007 | 01:40 AM
  #3  
neiler3's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 234
From: London
Default

That is an awesome set up you're running! I love it. Congrats, the numbers are great.
Old Jun 5, 2007 | 03:05 AM
  #4  
FuzzyLS BRO's Avatar
There's plenty to do outside my room but I choose not to!
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 7,392
Default

nice numbers doug! congrats on the outcome. just a question tho, i could be wrong, but it looks like at 8500rpm power starts to fall off, but your revving to about 9100rpm. is this because of the stock IM and TB?

if you were to get the SMSP header, TB and IM would that flatten out the drop from 8500-9100rpm? not ragging on your setup or anything, just curious.
Old Jun 5, 2007 | 03:54 AM
  #5  
Buff4Prez Yo's Avatar
There's plenty to do outside my room but I choose not to!
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,164
From: The Hammer!
Default

nice numbers doug!
Old Jun 5, 2007 | 06:04 AM
  #6  
Nawaaz's Avatar
Time to become a Premier Member!
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,681
From: London, ON
Default

nice numbers... and the car looks amazing
Old Jun 5, 2007 | 07:36 AM
  #7  
Baby NSX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 293
From: Toronto
Default

Originally Posted by HKJ
good job. whats up with your driver side door?
Thanks to the guys who stole my seets back in 1999 I had to have it repainted. Unfortunately under some lighting conditions you can see this effect. Oh well...

Originally Posted by FuzzyLS BRO
nice numbers doug! congrats on the outcome. just a question tho, i could be wrong, but it looks like at 8500rpm power starts to fall off, but your revving to about 9100rpm. is this because of the stock IM and TB?

if you were to get the SMSP header, TB and IM would that flatten out the drop from 8500-9100rpm? not ragging on your setup or anything, just curious.
Fuzz, the internals are rated for 10,000+RPM so I'm not very concerned about reving it 9000. I was curious to see how sharp the drop off was so that I could optimize my shift points. Looking at my graph it looks like shifting anyware from 8800-9000 RPM will keep me in the top of the power band.

For sure an SMSP header, larger TB, and different IM will raise the peak power a few hundred RPM and likely net me 10-20WHP. Of course it would follow that my shift points would change with it which is why I wanted to build the engine to handle 10,000RPM.
Old Jun 5, 2007 | 08:03 AM
  #8  
Solid GSR YO's Avatar
Time to become a Premier Member!
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,113
From: Closer than you think.
Default

nice numbers man , i never heard about your seats back in the day that kinda sucks.
Old Jun 5, 2007 | 08:07 AM
  #9  
nautica_t YO's Avatar
Post Whore
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,796
From: Canada
Default

damn very nice numbers doug
Old Jun 5, 2007 | 08:23 AM
  #10  
Big Hairy Gino's Avatar
Time to become a Premier Member!
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,146
From: MFE/956
Default

Good stuff! What numbers were you expecting to hit though?
Old Jun 5, 2007 | 08:26 AM
  #11  
Blue Dragon's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,883
From: outter space
Default

Nice numbers man
Old Jun 5, 2007 | 04:43 PM
  #13  
FuzzyLS BRO's Avatar
There's plenty to do outside my room but I choose not to!
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 7,392
Default

Originally Posted by Baby NSX
Thanks to the guys who stole my seets back in 1999 I had to have it repainted. Unfortunately under some lighting conditions you can see this effect. Oh well...



Fuzz, the internals are rated for 10,000+RPM so I'm not very concerned about reving it 9000. I was curious to see how sharp the drop off was so that I could optimize my shift points. Looking at my graph it looks like shifting anyware from 8800-9000 RPM will keep me in the top of the power band.

For sure an SMSP header, larger TB, and different IM will raise the peak power a few hundred RPM and likely net me 10-20WHP. Of course it would follow that my shift points would change with it which is why I wanted to build the engine to handle 10,000RPM.

i see, so basically, even tho your power is dropping off after 8500rpm, you sill push it to 9100; that way when you shift you'll be in a better spot in terms of the power range for the next gear....right? :wtf:
Old Jun 5, 2007 | 05:59 PM
  #14  
Baby NSX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 293
From: Toronto
Default

Originally Posted by FuzzyLS BRO
i see, so basically, even tho your power is dropping off after 8500rpm, you sill push it to 9100; that way when you shift you'll be in a better spot in terms of the power range for the next gear....right? :wtf:
Yes! That is what I'm talking about. Here is a little image I put together to better Illustrate my point. Many people believe that the correct place to shift is shown in area A. For simplicity I've assumed that the revs drop 2000RPM when you shift gears. But look what happens when you shift at a higher engine speed.

Notice that the area B > area A.

It is the area under the curve that translates to vehicle speed and acceleration. All other things being equal the greater the area the faster the vehicle will reach the end of the gear (and hence accelerate faster).

Old Jun 5, 2007 | 06:25 PM
  #15  
1DA2NV's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,375
From: IN VTEC
Default

AH HA!!! i have the seceret and im gonna use it when i never go to the track lol...........cuz my car is slow and old
Old Jun 5, 2007 | 09:40 PM
  #16  
FuzzyLS BRO's Avatar
There's plenty to do outside my room but I choose not to!
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 7,392
Default

Originally Posted by Baby NSX
Yes! That is what I'm talking about. Here is a little image I put together to better Illustrate my point. Many people believe that the correct place to shift is shown in area A. For simplicity I've assumed that the revs drop 2000RPM when you shift gears. But look what happens when you shift at a higher engine speed.

Notice that the area B > area A.

It is the area under the curve that translates to vehicle speed and acceleration. All other things being equal the greater the area the faster the vehicle will reach the end of the gear (and hence accelerate faster).

ahh..wr3d, i got cha. kinda like shifting and still being in boost.
Old Jun 6, 2007 | 12:36 AM
  #17  
sikkkkktegra's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 889
From: Toronto
Default

great way to explain shift points. +1, it also depends if you power shift. if you power shift you gotta do it earlier
Old Jun 6, 2007 | 12:55 AM
  #18  
Geek's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 148
Default

Originally Posted by FuzzyLS BRO
ahh..wr3d, i got cha. kinda like shifting and still being in boost.
let's see those boosted numberssssssssssss



area under the curve...sounds like a job for integration
Old Jun 6, 2007 | 07:19 AM
  #19  
JDM_gsR's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,499
From: Brampton
Default

How much do they charge for tuning?
Old Jun 6, 2007 | 10:48 AM
  #20  
Juka's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 518
From: Waterloo
Default

Good job Doug.
Man, that bay is STILL cleaner than my dishes.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nbk
Pictures and Videos
5
Jan 18, 2007 05:21 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:29 AM.